Dead ferrets at University of Iowa prompt federal complaint
Media Coverage About SAEN Stop Animal Exploitation Now


Contact the USDA to DEMAND MAX FINE against University of Iowa:

Dr. Robert Gibbens
Director, Western Region, USDA
(970) 494-7478
[email protected] 
[email protected]


Please levy the MAXIMUM FINE against University of Iowa for their blatant disregard of the Animal Welfare Act which resulted in the deaths of two female ferrets and their offspring. Their behavior should NOT be tolerated and MUST be punished to the fullest extent of the law.


Dead ferrets at University of Iowa prompt federal complaint
By, March 27, 2018

Group seeks $70,000 fine: 'The university's negligence killed innocent mothers and their newborn children'

IOWA CITY — An Ohio-based animal advocacy group that monitors research facilities nationally for abuse violations has filed a complaint against the University of Iowa related to the deaths of at least seven ferrets in one of its labs.

Stop Animal Exploitation Now, the nonprofit that goes by SAEN, filed its complaint with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s western region in Fort Collins, Colo., on Monday, according to a copy of the complaint. It asked for an immediate investigation and a fine of at least $70,000, citing a letter UI officials sent the National Institutes of Health in December reporting an animal care technician on Oct. 29 found a dead female ferret and two dead kits in a cage.

Another female appeared to be in active labor, prompting the technician to contact veterinary and lab staff. They removed the dead animals and indicated all remaining females, called “jills,” were pregnant.

“The jills were separated and cages appropriately identified as breeder animals,” according to the UI letter.

Staff then monitored the laboring jill, who produced several dead kids, the UI reported. That jill, in poor condition, was euthanized, and a necropsy found more kits in utero. The animals were delivering five to 10 days before expected — pregnant jills typically are separated six to 10 days before anticipated labor, according to the letter.

The two jills in question were the first bred to a new genetically modified male, and UI officials reported being “unclear if the cause of early abortion and jill health are linked to a non-specific mutation.”

The university reported retraining the lab and reinforcing the “necessity for appropriate labeling of animal cages as breeders to allow separation and transfer to proper caging.”

“Future pregnancies will be closely monitored from this new FO genetically engineered hob to determine if this premature parturition is a trait associated with the zygote engineering,” according to UI letter.

In a statement provided to The Gazette on Tuesday, the university reported taking the health and safety of animals in its care “very seriously” and involving its Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee immediately after the incident in question.

“After looking into the matter, (the committee) ordered retraining of the research team’s lab staff, implemented new protocol to ensure the situation wouldn’t be repeated in the future, and notified the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare in the National Institutes of Health, the funding agency for this research, as required by the agency,” according to the UI statement.

The research behind the incident involved advancing treatments for cystic fibrosis — a progressive, genetic disease that causes lung infections and limits patients’ ability to breathe, according to Stephen Pradarelli, strategic communications director for the UI Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development.

The lab involved is part of the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology in the UI Carver College of Medicine. National Institutes of Health records show the project began in September 2014 and is slated to continue through May 2019, receiving since its inception $3.3 million in federal support. It’s current funding cycle through May involves a grant budget of $809,552.

SAEN, in its complaint, called the UI incident a clear violation of the Animal Welfare Act. It cited several sections of the federal act, including one requiring adequate veterinary care and qualified personnel.

“The lab staff were so inept in this area that they had not even separated the pregnant animals and labeled the cages as breeders, which may have been the cause (in part) of the lack of observation for the pregnant animals,” according to SAEN’s complaint.

“This incident clearly demonstrates that University of Iowa staff is either unwilling or unable to comply with federal regulations relevant to even the most basic aspects of animal husbandry, such adequate veterinary care.” 

See also:

Return to Media Coverage