ACTION ALERT:
Dr. Robert Gibbens
Director, Animal Welfare Operations, USDA-APHIS
[email protected]
[email protected]
Please levy the MAXIMUM FINE against the University of Florida for their
blatant disregard of the Animal Welfare Act which led to the deaths of two
dogs. Their behavior should NOT be tolerated and MUST be punished to the
fullest extent of the law.
Animal rights group files complaint against UF research ending in dog deaths
From Alan Festo, Gainesville.com, February 10, 2023
A national animal rights watchdog group has filed a complaint against the
University of Florida over the deaths of two dogs involved in a research
study last year.
Stop Animal Exploitation Now!, or SAEN, believes UF has committed “multiple
clear violations” of the Animal Welfare Act based on a research report
submitted by UF on Oct. 6, 2022, to the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
— part of the National Institutes of Health.
"The University of Florida is committed to the ethical use of animals in its
pursuit of medical advances that benefit both humans and animals," an
emailed statement from the university said. "Almost every drug, treatment,
medical device, diagnostic tool or cure we have today was developed with the
help of laboratory animals. Animal research at UF is governed by a federally
mandated Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee that reviews all
requests for approval to use vertebrate animals and inspects all areas where
animals are housed and used.
University officials say that its Animal Care and Use Program has received
full and continued accreditation from AAALAC International, a nonprofit that
promotes the humane treatment of animals in science.
"Full accreditation serves as a testament to our program’s commitment to
quality and humane animal care, rigorous research practices, and continuous
improvement," UF's statement said.
UF's muscular dystrophy research
In a report written by UF's Vice President for Research David Norton, two
groups of dogs — one on June 24 and the other on Aug. 19 — with Duchenne
muscular dystrophy received an adeno-associated virus vector — a form of
gene therapy — administrated directly into the heart.
The report notes that “the procedure went smoothly and the dogs recovered
well.”
On Aug. 20, however, one of the dogs began to show "abnormal respiratory
signs" after receiving an injection a day earlier. According to UF's report,
the dog was taken to UF's Small Animal Hospital where its condition "rapidly
deteriorated" and it ultimately stopped breathing.
On Sept. 3, another dog involved in the June 24 study suffered an "episode
of regurgitation." Over the following days, the dog developed intermitted
inappetence, fever and abnormal palpitation. The dog was admitted to the
Small Animal Hospital on Sept. 7 for imaging and supportive care. A hiatal
hernia and evidence of pneumonia were discovered during testing. After
receiving treatment, the dog's appetite and fever returned to normal and it
was discharged on Sept. 12.
But just three days later, the dog's fever returned and suffered from
"respiratory distress." The dog was taken back to the hospital where a
decision was made on Sept. 18 to euthanize the animal
The complaint alleges that the dog died on Aug. 20 as a result of not being
treated soon timely, and that the animal was not adequately observed. The
complaint insists on a full investigation of UF's muscular dystrophy
research and, upon its conclusion, UF be issued the maximum allowable fine
of $12,722 per infraction per animal.
The university's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) voted
on Oct. 4 to classify the causes of death as adverse events to the
treatment.
As a result of the deaths, a UF report stated that the committee is
requiring that the lab and veterinarians with UF's Animal Care Services
division develop a standard operating procedure for UF's Small Animal
Hospital so that the dogs receive better care. The committee also has
required modification to the IACUC protocol to better outline human
endpoints.
SAEN writes in its complaint that UF's decision to make changes to its
procedures and practices is an admission of its responsibility for the dogs'
deaths.
It's not the first time the activist group took issue with UF's research
involving animals.
In March 2021, the group called out the university over an Oct. 20, 2020
report that detailed closed-head traumatic brain injuries were induced in 25
mice, three of which showed adverse clinical signs. On Dec. 6, 2020, lab
staff used a cautery pen on a rat’s head to stop bleeding. It ignited a
flame that singed fur on the rat’s face and burnt its whiskers. The rat was
euthanized the next day.