From Rick Nathanson, ABQJournal.com, March 5, 2023
A researcher using laboratory mice at the New Mexico Institute of Mining
and Technology in Socorro has had his research privileges terminated after
allegations surfaced that the rodents were not being cared for properly.
Concerns about the mouse colony, used as part of a federally funded cancer
study, were first reported by a staff member in 2021 and only brought to
light last week in a written complaint to New Mexico Tech President Stephen
Wells from Michael A. Budkie, executive director of the animal rights
organization Stop Animal Exploitation NOW!, or SAEN.
The complaint asked Wells to “take immediate action to correct serious
abuses” regarding the animal research at the university, and that the
university return the federal money used to fund the research.
In response, the university said the alleged abuse was reported,
investigated and corrective action taken. It also acknowledged that there
was enough evidence to substantiate the allegations.
Federal funding for the mouse study was $95,166, of which $47,280 was spent
before the project was terminated, according to Mikell Coleman, the
university’s director of research compliance. The unspent portion had not
yet been awarded, so there’s nothing to return, and “the process in cases
like this does not include returning the expended funds,” Coleman, said.
In his complaint, Budkie reviewed specific abuses that reportedly occurred,
including leaving mice without food or water, “some of whom resorted to
cannibalism,” and allowing inexperienced personnel and undergraduate
students to conduct surgical procedures on living mice without supervision.
The incidents of alleged abuse and neglect, as well as violations of
protocol and record keeping, all occurred in 2021.
The reason SAEN, which is based in Milford, Ohio, is now filing the
complaint letter with the university is because the documents regarding the
university’s investigation and disposition of the allegations were only
recently obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, “and that
process is never quick,” Budkie said Tuesday.
The university had filed the paperwork with the federal government because
the animal research was federally funded, and for labs to be eligible for
that funding they must show that the care provided to animals is in
compliance with federal standards, Budkie said.
In responding to questions from the Journal, raised by SAEN’s release of its
letter on Feb. 27, Coleman said in a statement that in addition to
termination of the researcher’s privileges, funding for the research was
terminated voluntarily by the university, which “effectively ended that type
of research at New Mexico Tech.
Coleman also noted that the researcher, Stewart Thompson, an assistant professor of psychology and education, was a member of the university’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, the governing body that approves and reviews animal research practices. Thompson was subsequently “disallowed from participating in the investigation in any capacity other than as its subject,” Coleman said.
Documents received via the FOIA, also made available by SAEN, showed that
the university’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee determined that
there was enough evidence to substantiate the allegations.
New Mexico Tech reported those findings to the National Institutes of Health
Office for Laboratory Animal Welfare.
“The IACUC and Research Compliance staff take animal welfare seriously,”
Coleman said. “The conduct was discovered and reported, thoroughly
investigated, and subsequently adjudicated. The corrective actions taken
were the most severe actions the IACUC and the New Mexico Tech Research
Office had the authority to take.”