From Steve Neavling, MetroTimes.com, February 2, 2024
The ongoing animal research controversy surrounding the University of
Michigan has intensified after yet another article linked to a disgraced
researcher has been retracted due to fabricated or falsified data.
Stop Animal Exploitation Now! (SAEN), a national watchdog group that
investigates animal abuse and illegal activities at research facilities, is
calling on federal authorities to declare Chung Owyang guilty of research
misconduct.
In early January, Gastroenterology retracted an article published in 2009
about “visceral pain responses in rats” after the University of Michigan
raised concerns about falsified or fabricated data. It’s at least the ninth
research article connected to Owyang that has been retracted in the past two
years.
In a letter this week to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Serivces’s Office of Research Integrity (ORI), SAEN points out that nearly $1.4 million in federal funds were used on the fraudulent research.
“In other words, an article connected to roughly $1.4 million in annual
funding given to two UM researchers, which subjected rats to intentionally
inflicted pain, generated nothing more than potentially falsified data,”
SAEN Executive Director Michael A. Budkie wrote in the letter. “In other
words, animals suffered horribly and died for nothing more than potentially
falsified/ fabricated data.”
Budkie argues that federal authorities have sufficient information to take
action against Owyang, who stopped working at the university in January
2023.
“The Office of Research Integrity clearly has an overabundance of
information,” Budkie writes. “Chung Owyang’s Research Misconduct is obvious.
He is connected to nine retracted publications. What is ORI waiting for?
Close this case!”
Metro Times couldn’t reach Owyang for comment.
In January, SAEN called for a separate investigation into unrelated research
at the University of Michigan involving highly invasive experiments that
induced seizures in mice. Another scientific journal retracted an article
due to “unreliable” and duplicated data from partially federally funded
research.
The National Center for Biotechnology Information retracted the April 2013
article late last year after citing concerns “raised regarding the
scientific validity.” Some of the information was “improbable” and
“unreliable,” the journal stated in its retraction.
The University of Michigan also came under fire recently for its handling of yet more animal research, this time for multiple violations, including the botched euthanasia of mice. SAEN called for an independent audit and the termination of the lab workers involved.
In another case, the U.S. Department of Agriculture cited the university
for seven violations of the Animal Welfare Act following inspections in
March 2023 and May 2023. The violations ranged from a botched euthanasia on
a rabbit to administering expired drugs to a calf.
In response to questions from Metro Times last month, U-M spokeswoman Kim
Broekhuizen said the university “is committed to fostering and upholding the
highest ethical standards in the conduct of research and scholarship.”
“We take this responsibility very seriously and have numerous policies and
controls in place to ensure animal welfare,” Broekhuizen continued.
She said the university’s accreditation body and the National Institute of
Health’s Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare “reviewed these matters and
found that the University took all necessary steps to correct and
self-report these isolated incidents.”
SAEN argues that the incidents are far from isolated and represent serious,
ongoing problems with the university’s animal research.