From OneGreenPlanet.org, March 19, 2024
A recent federal complaint filed against the University of South Florida (USF) by a national Animal rights group has brought attention to alleged violations of the Animal Welfare Act. The complaint, lodged by Stop Animal Exploitation Now, highlights concerns surrounding a research project that resulted in the deaths of two pigs due to post-surgical complications.
The project, funded by the National Institutes of Health and involving kidney removals, came under scrutiny after USF reported the incidents in January. According to the university’s communication to the NIH, the project was halted following the euthanasia of the first two animals due to complications arising from an unauthorized procedure conducted in July.
USF’s internal report admitted to a lack of clear structure, planning,
and communication within the project. It revealed deficiencies in
post-operative care, inadequate training of research staff, and the absence
of necessary approvals for the surgical procedures. These revelations have
prompted calls for investigation and prosecution by animal rights advocates,
including fines of over $12,000 per animal.
Michael Budkie, the executive director of Stop Animal Exploitation Now, has
emphasized the need for accountability, placing responsibility on the USF
administration for approving a flawed protocol. He said, “It’s a federally
funded project and we believe the people in this country that are paying the
bill have a right to know. The real responsibility for this fiasco has to
rest with the University of South Florida administration that approved this
protocol, because it’s quite clear that the personnel were not adequately
trained. … And so this project never should have been launched.”
While USF maintains its commitment to the ethical treatment of animals in research, critics like Budkie argue for more stringent oversight and alternative methods to animal experimentation. They advocate for the adoption of advanced technologies, such as 3D-printed organs made with human tissue, as more ethical and scientifically relevant alternatives. The incident raises broader questions about the ethical implications of animal research, particularly in federally funded projects.
See also: